A between-subjects study with 30 participants comparing custom AR and mobile interfaces comparing equivalent information, measuring robot and environmental SA with the Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT) across all three levels, with concurrent eye tracking to identify the attentional mechanisms underlying any SA differences.
Abstract
Augmented reality (AR) facilitates human-robot collaboration (HRC) by enabling in-situ spatial visualizations of the robot and the joint task. However, in safety-critical HRC scenarios such as search-and-rescue, spatial visualizations may also reshape visual attention in ways that create competing situational awareness (SA) demands, potentially introducing new safety concerns. While prior AR-HRC work suggests potential benefits for SA, rigorous evaluations that jointly consider robot and environmental awareness across multiple levels of SA remain limited. We address this through a between-subjects study with 30 participants comparing custom AR and mobile interfaces presenting equivalent information, measuring robot and environmental SA with the Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT) across all three levels, with concurrent eye tracking to identify the attentional mechanisms underlying any SA differences. Both interfaces achieved high usability; relative to the mobile baseline, AR improved perception-level awareness of the robot but yielded no gains in higher-level robot awareness or in environmental awareness at any level. Gaze analysis explained this: AR freed attention from the map, but that attention was re-invested in the conformal visuals rather than the physical environment. Freeing the eyes from a screen is not the same as directing them to the world, a distinction AR interfaces for safety-critical HRC must design around.
Augmented reality (AR) enables simulating robots in Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) research, offering a cheaper, more accessible, and flexible alternative to complex, resource-intensive physical setups. However, the comparability of AR and physical HRI results remains unclear. In this paper, we address this question by...
Enrico Guerra, Esther A. Semmelhack, Anne Schacht et al.· Message Understanding Confer...· 0 citations
Augmented reality (AR) can improve human-robot collaboration (HRC) by spatially presenting robot state, intent, and task information, but such content can also introduce a security-relevant loss of situational awareness. We present ARpocalypse, an interactive demonstration in which participants collaborate with a robot...
Christian Fronk, Zhe-Han Qu, Miroslav Pajic et al.· Proceedings of the Second Wo...· 0 citations
It is demonstrated that the fixed reality modality affects HRI results, and dynamically changing the modality along the RVC improves them, highlighting the value of adaptive XR interfaces for human-robot symbiosis.
Carl Tornberg, Alicia Torck, Lotfi El Hafi et al.· 0 citations
This paper investigates how Quality of Experience (QoE) and User Experience (UX) evaluations of a geo-located augmented reality (AR) interface designed to support navigation and situational awareness in a security context differ across participant groups with distinct domain-related backgrounds. To address the limitati...
K. Mišura, M. Sužnjević, M. Čolić· Applied Sciences· 0 citations
Maintaining situational awareness (SA) is critical for safe and effective interaction in complex environments where operators work near heavy machinery. SA is challenged by constrained spaces, limited visibility, high noise, and increasing automation, which can reduce operators’ understanding of machine behavior. Using...
Natalia Karhu, Aleph Campos Da Silveira, Albina Rurenko et al.· Proceedings of the 14th Nord...· 0 citations
Effective collaboration across virtual and mixed reality environments depends heavily on how users perceive and understand one another’s actions and movements. In this paper, we evaluate how different teleportation visualization techniques for a virtual reality (VR) user affect the experience of a mixed reality (MR)...
Lea Brzica, Filip Matanović, Lea Skorin-kapov et al.· Virtual Reality· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 23, 2026
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 22, 2026
“X-Hinges” helps design and 3D print items like lamps and gloves with an interactive twist: automatically embedded sensors that perceive and adaptively respond to human contact.
Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.