STEELBENCH is introduced, a diagnostic benchmark for industrial surveillance that jointly evaluates per-worker activity recognition, safety-rule reasoning, and annotation provenance and finds that unaudited VLM-sourced ground truth can inflate same-family model accuracy by up to 17 percentage points.
Abstract
Existing video benchmarks evaluate action recognition on consumer videos, egocentric recordings, or simulated industrial environments. They do not test vision-language models under the visual and procedural conditions of real industrial CCTV, where workers appear as distant figures amid dust, steam, low light, glare, occlusion, and overlapping activities. We introduce STEELBENCH, a diagnostic benchmark for industrial surveillance that jointly evaluates per-worker activity recognition, safety-rule reasoning, and annotation provenance. SteelBench contains 1,345 densely annotated clips, curated from 149 hours of operational plant footage and 10,024 candidate clips using temporal deduplication, class balancing, and visibility-aware stratified sampling. Each clip includes dense per-worker action labels, PPE attributes, spatial context, and safety-rule annotations. Because model-assisted annotation can shape the labels later used for model evaluation, SteelBench includes a provenance-aware audit protocol. The protocol measures label influence, evaluates sensitivity to ground-truth provenance, and reports a human reference from expert-reviewed labels. Applying this audit, we find that unaudited VLM-sourced ground truth can inflate same-family model accuracy by up to 17 percentage points. Across nine VLMs from four architectural families, the best model reaches only 42.6% action accuracy, compared with an 84.6% human benchmark. Performance also fragments across recognition, robustness, calibration, and safety reasoning. Even when models predict the correct action, 37-58% of cases still yield incorrect safety judgments, and no model passes more than 2 of 5 diagnostic checks. The dataset is publicly available on Hugging Face.
Reliable visual safety understanding in real-world scenarios demands more than just object recognition; it requires causal reasoning under epistemic uncertainty. While Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) demonstrate impressive semantic alignment on standard benchmarks, they often struggle to distinguish between superficial correlation and genuine forensic logic when grounded in the dynamic, partially observable nature of first-person experiences. Existing evaluations, dominated by third-person surveillance footage and binary classification metrics, fail to expose this cognitive gap. To address this, we introduce EgoSafe-Bench, a benchmark specifically designed to probe forensic reasoning in egocentric safety scenarios. It comprises 12,000 unique evaluation samples, generated by pairing each of the 3,000 video clips with a QA chain governed by our proposed Hierarchical Reasoning Evaluation (HRE) protocol. Unlike standard benchmarks, HRE mandates a rigorous reasoning trajectory from initial feature anchoring to blind-spot deduction and intent inference, thereby enforcing logical consistency and penalizing shortcut-based predictions. Extensive evaluations of state-of-the-art LVLMs (e.g., Qwen3-VL, Gemini, VideoLLaMA 3) reveal a significant perception-reasoning decoupling: models often achieve high descriptive scores but exhibit notable fragility in causal reasoning and logical closure. Our work provides both a challenging dataset and a systematic evaluation framework to foster the development of logically robust video understanding systems.
Yuyun Chen, Tianao Li, TianQuan Feng et al.· 0 citations
Remote-sensing videos enable real-time observation of changes in target attributes, short-term activities, and scene evolution. They record motion, actions, interactions, and scene changes that cannot be captured by isolated images. Existing models primarily target single images or discrete temporal observations spanning a long time range. However, a unified evaluation setting for assessing vision-language models on continuous remote-sensing video understanding remains lacking. We introduce RSVideo-10K, a remote-sensing video dataset comprising 10,773 instances, 1.47 million frames, and 17.02 hours of footage, containing both unmanned aerial vehicles and satellite platforms. Its fixed evaluation benchmark, RSVideo-Bench, contains 2,731 test instances and evaluates two complementary aspects of remote-sensing video understanding: L1 Perception and L2 Reasoning, spanning seven capability groups and 17 tasks. Evaluations show that current vision-language models still struggle to recover small local evidence, track short-lived states, and use scene-constrained spatial relations. Based on this analysis, we further propose RSVideo, a reinforcement learning framework for small-target spatiotemporal focusing that selects question-relevant regions across frames and suppresses redundant background tokens. RSVideo achieves a maximum absolute improvement of 9.01% with InternVL3.5-14B and attains the highest accuracy of 40.63% with Qwen3.6-27B across 26 open-source vision-language backbones. Codes will be available at https://github.com/HongjieZhou0329/RSVideo.
Hongjie Zhou, Shiqin Wang, Haoyang Chen et al.· 0 citations
CAViAR exposes a practical Perception--Reasoning Gap: current VLMs may recognize salient context, but do not reliably map visible agent actions to annotated rule-relevant responsibility categories in safety-critical driving scenarios, and all models degrade sharply on accident type and responsibility reasoning.
Sparsh Garg, Yi-Wen Chen, Vijay Kumar et al.· 0 citations
Continuous surveillance video creates a growing storage, transmission, and inference burden for enterprise video analytics systems. While modern codecs such as H.265 reduce bitrate for human-viewable video, aggressive compression can degrade downstream computer-vision performance and does not necessarily reduce the number of vision-language model (VLM) inference calls required for semantic video understanding. This paper evaluates BLUE, a fixed-camera surveillance compression approach that suppresses static-background redundancy while preserving foreground activity, for its effect on VLM-based event and anomaly understanding. We compare raw H.265 and BLUE-compressed H.265 video on two surveillance datasets: VIRAT, comprising 227 paired event samples from 106 clips, and CHAD, comprising 54 human-activity anomaly clips. For each pair, the same frame index is evaluated using a VLM captioning pipeline, and outputs are scored against annotation-derived ground truth using a blind judging protocol. The results show no measurable degradation in semantic inference quality. On VIRAT, the mean VLM score remains effectively unchanged between raw H.265 and BLUE, with a mean difference of approximately -0.01 on a 0-10 scale. On CHAD, raw H.265 and BLUE obtain near-equivalent mean scores of 4.31 and 4.26, respectively. Compression saving is also uncorrelated with VLM score change on VIRAT (r = 0.004), indicating that higher BLUE compression does not predict semantic quality loss. Beyond storage reduction, BLUE increases the share of skip-heavy P-frames on CHAD from 1.4% to 53.2%, enabling an estimated 53% reduction in VLM calls through packet-size-based frame skipping. These findings suggest that BLUE functions as a machine-centric compression layer for surveillance video, reducing bandwidth and inference cost while preserving VLM semantic performance.
Shubham Baid, Akash James, Sahil Chachra et al.· 0 citations
Object-counting methods have rapidly shifted from class-specific density regression to open-vocabulary, foundation-model-backed counters. These methods now enumerate instances from various visual and textual prompts. While this shift marks major conceptual progress, our survey argues that claims of universal generality have outpaced the evaluative infrastructure. Most progress metrics rely on a few saturated benchmarks that models exploit for statistical regularities. Newly introduced diagnostic datasets reveal systematic failures in semantic grounding, temporal identity, and spatial reasoning with occlusion. To address these failures, we introduce a five-axis taxonomy (modality, mechanism, prompting, supervision level, and generalization setting). We use this taxonomy to audit the literature across application domains, including microscopy, remote sensing, crowd counting, and agriculture. This formalizes prevailing challenges into six structural contradictions. From these, we propose a roadmap for compositional scene understanding, active counting agents, and unified multimodal evaluation protocols. The main imperative is to build a robust evaluation infrastructure to distinguish open-world generalization from benchmark-specific optimization, rather than simple incremental engineering.
Joana Konadu Owusu, S. Sheshappanavar· 0 citations
Natural-language-driven"vibe coding"enables the one-shot generation of visually rich and interactive web applications, yet reliable assessment of their quality has not kept pace. Existing evaluations often score isolated artifacts or final task outcomes, offering limited evidence about which failures occur and why. We introduce VideoVIBE, a video-grounded benchmark that transforms human-operated webpage recordings into fine-grained diagnostic tasks. It contains approximately 1.7K diagnostic Video QA instances derived from 6,338 verified failures across generated webpages, spanning semantic-logical, visual-motion, structural-temporal, and functional failures. Diagnoses are grounded primarily in recorded presentation and behavior, with webpage source code used as complementary context. We further propose V2Lens, a training-free, evidence-grounded multi-agent system that challenges and selectively refines initial video-based diagnoses through targeted visual and source-code verification. Across thirteen closed-source and open-weight Video MLLMs, Gemini-2.5-Flash is the strongest standalone model with a score of 64.54, while V2Lens reaches 71.72, an improvement of 7.18 points. Together, our results show that video-grounded evaluation can move beyond isolated artifacts and aggregate outcomes toward a behaviorally faithful and diagnostically informative account of generated application quality.
Jiajun Xu, Yanghao Zhou, Jing Liao et al.· 0 citations