This work proposes a QKD source that is intrinsically robust against side-channel attacks, and under idealized source assumptions commonly adopted in proposals for existing schemes, conventional decoy-state security analyses apply directly, yielding substantially higher key rates.
Abstract
Quantum key distribution (QKD) is secure in principle, but practical security can be undermined by discrepancies between real devices and the idealized models assumed in security proofs. Source side channels, including those exploited by Trojan-horse attacks, are particularly detrimental: neglecting them compromises implementation security, whereas accounting for them reduces performance. Here we propose a QKD source that is intrinsically robust against side-channel attacks. Unlike existing passive and modulator-free schemes, it requires neither post-selection of the emitted pulses nor devices with a perfect extinction ratio to suppress side channels, and it does not introduce correlations between the intensity and the encoded bit or basis. Consequently, under idealized source assumptions commonly adopted in proposals for existing schemes, conventional decoy-state security analyses apply directly, yielding substantially higher key rates. Our proposal appears to be within reach of current technology and therefore provides a clear and practical path toward implementation-secure QKD.
This work presents a security proof for generic prepare-and-measure QKD protocols, including decoy-state BB84, with imperfect and imperfectly characterized sources and detectors using the marginal-constrained entropy accumulation theorem (MEAT).
Jerome Wiesemann, John Burniston, Devashish Tupkary et al.· 0 citations
A simple finite-key security proof based on phase-error estimation for prepare-and-measure QKD in the presence of either a priori information leakage about the basis choices and/or a posteriori information leakage about the measurement outcomes is presented.
Álvaro Navarrete, Margarida Pereira, Guillermo Currás-Lorenzo et al.· 0 citations
A three-axis taxonomy of QSDC protocols is proposed, classifying them by quantum resource type, physical transmission channel, and device trust model, and it presents a comparative performance analysis of QKD employing a hyperchaotic cipher over QSDC channels across seven quantum image representations, showing that QKD...
S. Deepika, N. Jeyanthi· Frontiers of Physics· 0 citations
It is shown that general post-selective soft-filtering transformations of side-channel states can be consistently incorporated into the GLLP and Koashi framework, and a Holevo-based upper bound on the eavesdropper's information for decoy-state BB84 is derived.
I. Sushchev, Kirill Bugai, D. Bulavkin et al.· AVS Quantum Science· 0 citations
ModPhase-8 is introduced, a proposed QKD modulation and adaptive-receiver architecture evaluated through analytical modeling and simulation that provides an analytical security assessment under the stated collective-attack, source, channel, receiver, and trusted-device assumptions, supplemented by attack-specific analy...
Vidhya Prakash Rajendran, D. Perumalsamy, Basker Palaniswamy et al.· Information· 1 citation
Although the unconditional security of quantum key distribution (QKD) protocol has been mathematically proven, actual QKD network nodes may be vulnerable to side-channel attacks such as ElectroMagnetic (EM) wave leakage. In this study, we measured EM emissions from a prototype QKD device implementing a time-bin decoy B...
Mikio Fujiwara, Katsumi Fujii, F. Ono et al.· IEEE Access· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.