Understanding of the genetic architecture of AD in the context of its main genetic driver is improved, and APOE-stratified insights may help understand and overcome side effects, inform clinical trial enrollment strategies, and create the scientific basis for targeted, mechanism-driven therapies in neurodegenerative diseases.
Abstract
Among the more than 90 identified genetic risk loci for late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias, the apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene ɛ2/ɛ3/ɛ4 polymorphisms remain the longstanding benchmark for genetic disease risk with a consistently large effect across studies1-10. Despite this massive signal, the exact mechanisms by which ɛ4 increases and ɛ2 decreases dementia risk remain poorly understood. Notably, recent trials of anti-amyloid therapies suggest less efficacy and higher risks of severe side effects in ε4 carriers11-13, hampering the treatment of those with the highest unmet need. To improve our understanding of the genetic architecture of AD in the context of its main genetic driver, we performed genome-wide association studies (GWASs) stratified by ε4 and ε2 carrier status. HP1BP3, SLC50A1, PTPRC, NPAS3, DDHD1, CHST9, SMYD2, PRAMEF1 and GFRA1 emerged as new genomic signals for AD risk, appearing only when stratified by APOE carrier status. DDHD1 appeared especially promising, showing protective effects in ε4 carriers, being identified as an expression quantitative trait locus and being involved in rare neuronal diseases. Such APOE-stratified insights may help understand and overcome side effects, inform clinical trial enrollment strategies, and create the scientific basis for targeted, mechanism-driven therapies in neurodegenerative diseases.
Genetic and clinical evidence is provided that specific selenoproteins are associated with a decreased risk of AD and highlight the potential role of these proteins in AD pathophysiology and suggest their promise as biomarkers or therapeutic targets, warranting further investigation.
Pei-Xin Jiang, Si-Bo Peng, Yan-Ling Huang et al.· Journal of Alzheimer's Disea...· 0 citations
Background Whether plasma protein associations with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) differ by genetic risk remains unclear. Methods We studied 18,212 UK Biobank participants aged ≥ 60 years with Olink Explore 3072 proteomic data, APOE genotypes, and AD polygenic risk scores. Protein-by-genetic risk interactions were screened,...
Yuan-Ming Leng, Hui-Tong Ding, Jian Yang et al.· Research Square· 0 citations
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and overlapping pathologies represent a growing worldwide health concern. With the first disease-modifying treatments on the rise, it becomes increasingly important to move research in this area forward. Genetic research is excellent at discovering novel contributors to disease mechanisms, whic...
Celeste Laureyssen, D. Thal, K. Sleegers· Acta Neuropathologica· 0 citations
Progress in multi-omics technologies, disease models using induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC), gene editing with CRISPR-Cas9, and artificial intelligence (AI) analysis are likely to speed up the implementation of precision medicine for early diagnosis, risk prediction, and treatment of Alzheimer's disease.
Sumithira George, Sharan Kumar, Sivakumar Subramaniyan et al.· Middle East Research Journal...· 0 citations
Despite the identification of numerous genetic risk variants for Alzheimer's disease (AD), mechanisms through which these variants act remain unclear. Identifying specific proteins levels affected by genetic variation can provide valuable insights into the underlying biological pathways implicated in AD. To gain more i...
L. Reus, Chen-Yang Jiang, N. Vilor-Tejedor et al.· Molecular Neurodegeneration...· 0 citations